So why is Lawyers Defend Criminals?


The commonest question I run into for a Washington State Criminal Defense Attorney is definitely, “How can you defend scammers? ” This question is often based on two assumptions: – the Defendant is obviously sinful; and 2 . by counseling him or her, you are trying to permit this obviously guilty particular person to get away with their crime. As you will see, these assumptions turn into incorrect ones.

Arrest Does Not Identical Guilt

It’s tempting to believe that a Defendant must be bad because the police arrested them for something. However, legal issues have a much different standard regarding judging when a detain is valid versus each time a conviction is called for.

A valid detain requires Probable Cause. This specific term gets defined in numerous ways but generally exists if the facts and circumstances recognized by the arresting officer are usually sufficiently trustworthy to create a reasonable person to believe an offense has been committed. If you feel about that definition for a little bit, it becomes apparent that it’s in fact a very low standard; and it also should be.

The rule was created to make sure that there are some facts before an arrest is done but to balance the requirements regarding how strong those facts are with the speed of selection required to catch criminals.

Here is an example: A woman tells law enforcement that a man stole the woman’s purse. The police ask you and he denies knowing any aspect of the purse. Finally, the particular purse cannot be located. Beneath Probable Cause, there would be adequate to justify arresting you since the woman said he or she stole her purse. Can we know whether or not he achieved it? No. Should we allow Court System to determine whether or not really the man is guilty? Certainly!

Knowing that an arrest easily starts the Court Practice, Officers often err in the part of making an arrest in a very close call; as they should. The rest of the instructions read to Jurors emphasize the point, stating the fact that the fact the Defendant seemed to be arrested has no bearing on whether or not he or she is guilty of often the crime charged.

Beyond An affordable Doubt

We’ve all been told it on TV but the type in a criminal case is definitely “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. micron But what does that mean? The concept of a “reasonable doubt” can be characterized differently but is generally:

Just one for which a reason exists and can arise from the evidence as well as lack of evidence. It is a really doubt as would really exist in the mind of a real person after fully, quite, and carefully considering the many evidence or lack of information.

If we required a police agency to be convinced Beyond an affordable Doubt before they could perhaps arrest someone, all of the “bad guys” would get away ahead of the officer even concluding his / her investigation.

What do you do if someone is definitely guilty?

If someone is bad then there is nothing an Attorney is able to do about it. Keep in mind that

A court is made up of regular people. No matter how competent the attorney is, in the event the defendant is obviously guilty the particular jury will convict. In such cases, the attorney’s job provides two parts: discovering which usually charges the defendant is in fact guilty of and making sure the particular sentence is rational.

Above Charged

People are often above charged, i. e. offenders of more than the State can prove. One of these is where someone is an offender of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and also Reckless Driving. Very few situations of DUI also satisfy the standards required for Reckless Generating. In this case, if the Defendant will be guilty of DUI but not dangerous, a good Criminal Defense Attorney should be able to have the Reckless Driving charge trashed even though the Defendant is in the end convicted of DUI.

Realistic Sentencing

Once a Defendant is available guilty, the Court’s subsequent job is to impose word. The Attorney’s job will become making sure that the sentence is acceptable for the crime charged as well as the Defendant’s criminal history. As a general rule, a lot more criminal convictions someone offers, the more harshly they will be sentenced on any new costs. Sometimes, however, the requested by the prosecution will seek to punish somebody with little or no history exactly like they would a career felon. By sentencing first-time offenders as well as career criminals the same, do not reward those people who have resided basically good lives nor punish hard enough people who choose a life of criminal offense.

What do you do if the State is not able to prove the charge?

You will find two major categories of instances where the Prosecution fails to show their case, either first or at trial.


There are often times when the Requested by the prosecution simply does not have any proof that a Defendant is doing a crime. In this case, you can document a Motion to Write off and ask that a Judge evaluate the evidence to see if a retrenchment is required. This motion could require that witnesses look and give testimony or it might be based on the police reports by themselves.

At Trial

If the Justice has evidence that an individual is guilty, that is not the conclusion of the matter. How good is that evidence? Are the witnesses believable? Do they have a grudge against the Defendant? The heart of the judicial system is the Justice Trial. A trial is literally initially when anyone hears Every one of the evidence. Trials can be demanding but in a close case, they might be a lifesaver.

Trifles and The Law

I generally hear people say that some sort of Defendant got off caused of some technicality. There are zero “technicalities” in Law, there may be only The Law. Should it apply to everyone or should many of us allow the government to be resistant to following the law? In case the police violate the law, then this remedy can range from quelling evidence to throwing the case entirely.

The Court docket System is our best attempt at setting up a process that is fair. Similar to the system, however, it is only as well as the people who work in it. Defending people arrested for crimes is not with regards to “helping them get away with it, ” but rather it is with regards to ensuring that everyone is treated reasonably. At The Cahoon Law Place of work, we still focus on a single client at a time and ensure that legal defenses and protection under the law for our clients are used and guarded.

Copyright (c) 2007 rapid The Cahoon Law Place of work – All Rights Appropriated.

To ask the author additional inquiries about the Criminal Court Course of action or questions specific to your case, you can reach Legal professional Craig Cahoon at 866-529-5383 or email him at cahoonlaw@comcast. net There is a traveler regarding Driving Under the Influence charges along with defense strategies at The Cahoon Law Office.

Read also: Divorce Lawyers – Know Your Rights