They have the makings of a great youth soccer defense. How does it occur?
When designing a defense within youth football, you must first figure out what plays you are likely to defend. I’ve done instructor clinics all over the country, and I have yet to come across a group that didn’t think that the actual sweep was the play that they had to stop first to be effective in youth football. The majority also agreed that the Jump, Reverse, Off-tackle Power, and Drop Back Pass, had been the #2, #3, #4, and #5 threats. Numerous youth coaches felt the actual sweep was so essential to halt that they often listed the Sweep typically as #1, #2, and #3 in order worth focusing on. I may have to agree with this to an extent.
The second help in determining your defensive structure is ensuring you have a vision statement for your team. Your defensive scheme has to line up with your mission. Our mission affirmation is: To develop an enjoyment and appreciation of the sport in our players so they can gain benefit life lessons the game educates. We want to play competitive basketball, where the average individual and the team can succeed when playing everyone in all game titles, regardless of circumstances.
Obviously, for anyone who is like us and is planning to play everyone (it’s not all the same amount) or has a minimum amount of play rules, you have to ask; “Where can my most basic players play where they might have personal success by adding team value on each each snap? “. You have to ask, what schemes and approaches out there not only help us all stop the plays we will need to defend but also accommodate achieve of playing even lazy players on defense?
Typically the 4-4
When creating the defense we utilize now, we started using the base 4-4 that we obtained from Jay Smith, who, before coaching with us experienced, coached at Canyon Comes California High School. They received two USA Today Nationwide Championships during Jay’s period there. While this defense worked well for our “select” groups, it didn’t work well for our non-select teams. All of us found this defense needed two good down linemen, two rush ends which had to be somewhat athletic, four reasonably athletic and hostile linebackers, and three ancestry defensive
backs. While our own “select” teams didn’t will have the perfect mix of players just for this defense, they were able to make money well. Our “select” squads were the best players decided on from a group of 100-150 people; those not chosen were being put on “B” teams along with played other “B” squads of similar size along with abilities. As you might imagine, individuals “A” teams were made of a much different grouping of children than our “B” squads.
Need for a Change
While this category had no minimum participation in rules, I mandated 8-play minimum participation in rules for all of my squads in the league, and a fourth, there’s a 16-play minimum play concept for my team to demonstrate to my other coaches, which eight plays were painless to have in. With twenty-five players per team, there was too much hustle to get everybody their plays. We discovered we did not have the athleticism of these non-select groups to run the 4-4 efficiently and get
everyone in the game like those wanted to. Our weaker gamers were whiffing while playing in all that area, and we didn’t have two stud defensive linemen to anchor the middle; all the buttons were on the “A” group. We were getting beat upon sweeps because our two best linebackers had to perform the middle, and with the following only two best players playing exterior linebacker, they couldn’t cut off the sweep from their roles.
Designing Something that Works
There was to design a defense that might allow these less accomplished kids the chance to play along with competing by stopping the plays typically most of our adversaries were trying to establish, typically the sweep, dive, reverse/counter, off-tackle, and drop back to (lesser extent). Likewise, we had to factor in the completion percentages for childhood football teams in our spot. For ages 8-10 ?t had been about 20%; for 11-12, it was about 25%. For 13-14, it was about a third. So we came up with safety that concentrated on ending the run with a hefty emphasis on stopping the carry, stopping the home run, having fun with (reverse), clogging the inside, and allowing even our most minor kids to get on the arena. While our new organic defense didn’t look like whatever we had seen before, the item used some of the concepts in our old 4-4 for tricks and blitzes but included a new group of strategies we found average youngsters could execute.
Colleges Making use of this Defense.
Over time I discovered that defense (minus several junior techniques and adjustments we certainly have in place) was used within the ’60s when College clubs had to worry about defending the particular run more than they do nowadays with all the spread passing that may be so popular; imagine that. The problem is that numerous youth teams run the favorite college defenses like the 4-3, 4-4, 3-5-3, etc., which can be designed to stop the college criminal acts of today, not the work-based offenses of the
sixties or the youth offenses with the 20% pass completion costs. Our defense most strongly resembles a youth model of the Wide Tackle 6th that Jerry Claiborne’s clubs used at Virginia Technical and Maryland in the sixties and ’70s. When the school game moved to a lot more passing, this defense was abandoned as they did not sense they had the coverages within it to stop the higher passing teams effectively. It was highly successful back then and widely used after Claiborne managed to get famous at Maryland in addition to Virginia Tech.
Just 18-19 TDswere Given up in Continue 8 Seasons Total
That defense has served you well, helping us with a 78-5 record over the last main seasons. Our first workforce defense had just 18-19 touchdowns scored next to us in that period. The primary team has had one sweep play, and one reverse play of through 10 yards run next to it in that same time. For those that have 2006 as well as 2007 season DVDs, they will attest to that. More importantly, that defense has allowed you to play and even start a wide variety of our weakest players with defense.
Many coaches I recognize play their best 11 with defense and then put all their weaker kids on crime. This not only hamstrings the crime but deprives the kids of traveling the experience of playing both sides with the ball. Think about the plays you must stop and how you will find everyone in the game before you go with a defensive scheme for your young ones’ football team. While many will confirm to “coach what you know,” if you know a defense built to defend High School or School offenses, that defense is probably not the best choice to defend should see from youth criminal acts. And remember, the College and High school graduation teams aren’t required to enjoy all their kids; it is a different equation than those individuals coaching youth football need to deal with.
Dave is a Nike “Coach of the Year” Designated and speaks across the country at Coaches’ Clinics. His or her book “Winning Youth Footballing a Step by Step Plan” was endorsed by Dan Osborne and Dave Rimington. His teams using this method to date have won 94% of their games in a few Different Leagues.